To critics it sounds like a scenario from some Orwellian nightmare – an online database of workers accused of theft and dishonesty, regardless of whether they have been convicted of any crime, which bosses can access when vetting potential employees.
But this is no dystopian fantasy. Later this month, the National Staff Dismissal Register (NSDR) is expected to go live.
Organisers say that major companies including Harrods, Selfridges and Reed Managed Services have already signed up to the scheme. By the end of May they will be able to check whether candidates for jobs have faced allegations of stealing, forgery, fraud, damaging company property or causing a loss to their employers and suppliers.
Workers sacked for these offences will be included on the register, regardless of whether police had enough evidence to convict them. Also on the list will be employees who resigned before they could face disciplinary proceedings at work.
The project has attracted little publicity. But trade unions and civil liberties campaigners are warning that it leaves workers vulnerable to the threat of false accusations.
TUC policy officer Hannah Reed says that while criminal activity in the workplace can never be condoned, she fears such a system is open to abuse.
“The Criminal Records Bureau was set up to assist employers to make safe appointments when recruiting staff to work with vulnerable groups. The CRB already provides appropriate and properly regulated protection for employers. Under the new register, an employee may not be aware they have been blacklisted or have any right to appeal.”
James Welch, the legal director of human rights group Liberty, also says that he is concerned that the register does not offer sufficient redress to the falsely accused.
“This scheme appears to bypass existing laws which protect employees by limiting the circumstances when information about possible criminal activity can be shared with potential employers.”
Surely there’s a robust legal challenge to made against this sort of thing? I don’t know what the Data Protection Act actually says, but if it does anything then it’s got to protect us against this kind of extralegal blacklist. The NSDR has probably only got as far as it has through lack of publicity; I usually consider the act of writing to MPs as an act of the utmost futility but in this case I think it might get us somewhere, and maybe write to some newspapers too.
Facebook group: Workers against the NSDR [note: this link was broken before, now I've fixed it]


As a student, I get two votes (I know I know, but really there are far worse irregularities to get worked up about and besides, who really believes in parliamentary democracy anyway?), one for my term time address and one for my home address, so presumably I also get two MPs. I’ve written the following letter to them both:
Unfortunately, one of them is Gerald Kaufman and the other is James Purnell (the next leader of the Labour Party, or so he reckons), neither of whom I trust as far as I could spit. Write to your MP, he or she can’t be much worse. And your union rep too maybe?
I’ve also sent the following letter to Socialist Worker, the Guardian, Morning Star, the Independent and the Mirror:
I’m a veritable one man fuss-kicker-upper. Can you tell I haven’t found a summer job yet, comrades?
I have to say that it’s good news that you haven’t found temporary employment as yet, this blog makes excellent reading and the more time you can devote to it the better.
Thanks Dandy
Although I’m afraid I’m pretty busy anyway this week, trying to organise the Manchester delegation to the UAF demo on Sat. But it seems that I’ve got through to slimy James:
good work void, the only upside to unemployment eh? plenty of time to mither kaufman
is that how you spell mither? myther? nah that dont look right
Yeah it’s mither. One of the few Northern dialect words to have an entry in wiktionary (I added “skrike” about a year ago, and I see that “mard” is still not there. Eh I’ll add it now, doing my bit for the cause of Northern national liberation
).
Data protection act requires that they allow people access to their data and to correct it, at the very least. But the law requires many things and the rich and powerful are very good at circumventing it.
Indeed! But a lot is in flux at the moment, politically, a lot of what Gramsci called morbid symptoms (when the old alliances have died and the new are unable to form) are presenting themselves. I just need to find the right right-wing authoritarian MP to risk political martyrdom for me, and the database will be scuppered.
Anyway, Socialist Worker and Morning Star have both published my letter, although as far as I can tell the Mirror, the Indy and the Guardian have not. How effective my little intervention has been remains to be seen. Heard nothing back from Purnell yet, think I need to buzz him again on Mon.
Oh, it’s been raised in Parliament now, some fob-off cop-out non-answer was given: http://www.theyworkforyou.com/wrans/?id=2008-06-02a.18.3
Most MPs take a few weeks to get back to you when you write to them, I think. I’ve never bothered. Between Mandelson and, well, Mandelson it all seemed a bit of a waste of energy because who’d honestly believe that twonk would ever do anything useful? And now I’ve got a Tory. Bleh.
Like I say, in times like these Tories are doing the strangest of things; not inexplicable, but certainly out of character. I’d still be surprised if they were to mount a spirited defense of workers’ rights, but it might be worth giving Davis a poke. Anyway, Purnell’s secretary has already written back to me, saying the DWP are looking into it. Starting to suspect that’s all I’m gonna get.
I want to know if there is a black list of employees that companies look at so not to hire someone. Is there a list, if so, how do I find it?
Thanks