18
Jun
08

National Blacklisted Staff Register

Workers accused of theft or damage could soon find themselves blacklisted on a register to be shared among employers. It will be good for profits but campaigners say innocent people could find it impossible to get another job.

To critics it sounds like a scenario from some Orwellian nightmare – an online database of workers accused of theft and dishonesty, regardless of whether they have been convicted of any crime, which bosses can access when vetting potential employees.

But this is no dystopian fantasy. Later this month, the National Staff Dismissal Register (NSDR) is expected to go live.

Organisers say that major companies including Harrods, Selfridges and Reed Managed Services have already signed up to the scheme. By the end of May they will be able to check whether candidates for jobs have faced allegations of stealing, forgery, fraud, damaging company property or causing a loss to their employers and suppliers.

Workers sacked for these offences will be included on the register, regardless of whether police had enough evidence to convict them. Also on the list will be employees who resigned before they could face disciplinary proceedings at work.

The project has attracted little publicity. But trade unions and civil liberties campaigners are warning that it leaves workers vulnerable to the threat of false accusations.

TUC policy officer Hannah Reed says that while criminal activity in the workplace can never be condoned, she fears such a system is open to abuse.

“The Criminal Records Bureau was set up to assist employers to make safe appointments when recruiting staff to work with vulnerable groups. The CRB already provides appropriate and properly regulated protection for employers. Under the new register, an employee may not be aware they have been blacklisted or have any right to appeal.”

James Welch, the legal director of human rights group Liberty, also says that he is concerned that the register does not offer sufficient redress to the falsely accused.

“This scheme appears to bypass existing laws which protect employees by limiting the circumstances when information about possible criminal activity can be shared with potential employers.”

Surely there’s a robust legal challenge to made against this sort of thing?  I don’t know what the Data Protection Act actually says, but if it does anything then it’s got to protect us against this kind of extralegal blacklist.  The NSDR has probably only got as far as it has through lack of publicity; I usually consider the act of writing to MPs as an act of the utmost futility but in this case I think it might get us somewhere, and maybe write to some newspapers too.

Facebook group: Workers against the NSDR [note: this link was broken before, now I've fixed it]


13 Responses to “National Blacklisted Staff Register”


  1. June 18, 2008 at 10:51 am

    As a student, I get two votes (I know I know, but really there are far worse irregularities to get worked up about and besides, who really believes in parliamentary democracy anyway?), one for my term time address and one for my home address, so presumably I also get two MPs. I’ve written the following letter to them both:

    Are you aware of the National Staff Dismissal Register? It’s an online database of workers accused by their employers of dishonest behaviour launched by a private company (Hicam Business Solutions) with almost £1m of Home Office money.

    The stated intention of the NSDR is to protect businesses from losses due to employee theft and fraud, but the potential for systematic abuse is obvious. Employees have no warning that they are being added to the system, and no possibility of appeal, and so it would be very easy to make false accusations against trade unionists and other “troublemakers”. Such false accusations are already commonplace enough.

    Both the TUC and Liberty have already voiced similar concerns.

    We have seen an alarming curtailment of civil liberties and the presumption of innocence over the past decade, usually “justified” by the fear of terrorism. Are we now to suppose that the losses incurred by dishonest employees pose a threat of the same magnitude?

    Seriously, I find it hard to believe that this sort of thing isn’t banned by the Data Protection Act or something. The NSDR has benefitted from an almost total lack of publicity thus far; as my representative in the House of Commons I trust you will challenge it.

    Unfortunately, one of them is Gerald Kaufman and the other is James Purnell (the next leader of the Labour Party, or so he reckons), neither of whom I trust as far as I could spit. Write to your MP, he or she can’t be much worse. And your union rep too maybe?

  2. June 18, 2008 at 11:59 am

    I’ve also sent the following letter to Socialist Worker, the Guardian, Morning Star, the Independent and the Mirror:

    This month, the National Staff Dismissal Register goes online: an online database of workers accused of theft and dishonesty, regardless of whether they have been convicted of any crime, which bosses can access when vetting potential employees.

    The possibilities for employers using the NSDR to falsely accuse and blacklist trade unionists and other “troublemakers” is clear, and both the TUC and the Liberty pressure group have already voiced their concerns.

    However, the NSDR – launched by “Action Against Business Crime”, a joint initiative of big business and the Home Office – has so far benefitted from a lack of publicity, and a consequent lack of real opposition.

    The government has so far used the threat of terrorism to justify its curtailment of civil liberties; now the profits lost to employee theft seemingly pose a similar threat to civilisation. Clearly, the real target is workers’ rights.

    I’m a veritable one man fuss-kicker-upper. Can you tell I haven’t found a summer job yet, comrades?

  3. 3 theraffishdandy
    June 19, 2008 at 9:10 pm

    I have to say that it’s good news that you haven’t found temporary employment as yet, this blog makes excellent reading and the more time you can devote to it the better.

  4. June 20, 2008 at 4:35 am

    Thanks Dandy :) Although I’m afraid I’m pretty busy anyway this week, trying to organise the Manchester delegation to the UAF demo on Sat. But it seems that I’ve got through to slimy James:

    Thank you for your email. The matter has been taken up with the Department for Work and Pensions. When Mr Purnell receives their response I will contact you again.

  5. 5 red
    June 20, 2008 at 10:09 am

    good work void, the only upside to unemployment eh? plenty of time to mither kaufman

  6. 6 red
    June 20, 2008 at 10:09 am

    is that how you spell mither? myther? nah that dont look right

  7. June 20, 2008 at 10:34 am

    Yeah it’s mither. One of the few Northern dialect words to have an entry in wiktionary (I added “skrike” about a year ago, and I see that “mard” is still not there. Eh I’ll add it now, doing my bit for the cause of Northern national liberation ;) ).

  8. 8 Vasey
    June 27, 2008 at 6:44 pm

    Data protection act requires that they allow people access to their data and to correct it, at the very least. But the law requires many things and the rich and powerful are very good at circumventing it.

  9. June 27, 2008 at 7:03 pm

    the law requires many things and the rich and powerful are very good at circumventing it.

    Indeed! But a lot is in flux at the moment, politically, a lot of what Gramsci called morbid symptoms (when the old alliances have died and the new are unable to form) are presenting themselves. I just need to find the right right-wing authoritarian MP to risk political martyrdom for me, and the database will be scuppered.

    Anyway, Socialist Worker and Morning Star have both published my letter, although as far as I can tell the Mirror, the Indy and the Guardian have not. How effective my little intervention has been remains to be seen. Heard nothing back from Purnell yet, think I need to buzz him again on Mon.

    Oh, it’s been raised in Parliament now, some fob-off cop-out non-answer was given: http://www.theyworkforyou.com/wrans/?id=2008-06-02a.18.3

  10. 10 Vasey
    June 27, 2008 at 7:54 pm

    Most MPs take a few weeks to get back to you when you write to them, I think. I’ve never bothered. Between Mandelson and, well, Mandelson it all seemed a bit of a waste of energy because who’d honestly believe that twonk would ever do anything useful? And now I’ve got a Tory. Bleh.

  11. June 27, 2008 at 8:41 pm

    Like I say, in times like these Tories are doing the strangest of things; not inexplicable, but certainly out of character. I’d still be surprised if they were to mount a spirited defense of workers’ rights, but it might be worth giving Davis a poke. Anyway, Purnell’s secretary has already written back to me, saying the DWP are looking into it. Starting to suspect that’s all I’m gonna get.

  12. June 16, 2009 at 5:16 pm

    I want to know if there is a black list of employees that companies look at so not to hire someone. Is there a list, if so, how do I find it?

    Thanks


Leave a Reply